<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brentwrites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brentwrites.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brentwrites.com</link>
	<description>content that works for you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Getting to Know SEO: Keyword Research</title>
		<link>http://brentwrites.com/getting-to-know-seo-keyword-research/</link>
		<comments>http://brentwrites.com/getting-to-know-seo-keyword-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentwrites.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Search engine optimization (SEO) is one of those hot-button topics that can get some people pretty riled up. Yet once you&#8217;ve gotten your feet a bit wet and gain a decent grasp of what it&#8217;s all about (and trust me, this takes time), it&#8217;s really not so complicated. Regardless, <a href="http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/seo-sources/">SEO has been given a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search engine optimization (SEO) is one of those hot-button topics that can get some people pretty riled up. Yet once you&#8217;ve gotten your feet a bit wet and gain a decent grasp of what it&#8217;s all about (and trust me, this takes time), it&#8217;s really not so complicated. <span id="more-84"></span>Regardless, <a href="http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/seo-sources/">SEO has been given a bad name</a> by plenty of mainstream outlets who are often quick to disregard SEO practices as “spam” and nothing more.</p>
<p>Does SEO matter to you? It may very well not, or perhaps it does and you don&#8217;t realize it. Are you trying to drive organic traffic to your site? Do you want to appear on the first (or first few) pages of Google for a particular keyword? Do you want your site to eventually make some money, either through affiliate revenue or selling the domain itself? Okay, then. SEO matters.</p>
<p>My recent post about <a href="http://brentwrites.com/know-your-traffic-drive-your-content/">the importance of Google Analytic</a>s is a decent starting point as to why you probably want to be aware of your site&#8217;s search engine presence. Google Analytics is really at the heart of tracking your SEO efforts and traffic sources, with search engine traffic being the most intriguing to me, personally. Most people would probably agree. What are people searching to find me? User behavior when it comes to searching and keywords is rather fascinating, and I&#8217;m always amused when someone stumbles on one of my sites through a seemingly random keyword.</p>
<p>Getting traffic through keywords isn&#8217;t inherently easy, although it all depends on what you&#8217;re going for. Long-tail (three words or more) phrases are obviously easier to rank for than single terms. Sometimes you may rank for keywords unintentionally, such as if you&#8217;re running a personal blog and you happen to have a unique last name. It&#8217;s ranking for the keywords that people are paying for via AdWords that&#8217;s truly tricky.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve never tackled keyword research before, I suggest you spend some time playing with the <a href="https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=2155178793&amp;__c=5724886113&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none">Google Adwords Keyword Tool</a>. This can help you better understand how people are searching for terms related to your site, how fierce the competition is, long-tail vs. single term, etc. If nothing else, it&#8217;s a good bit of fun (in my opinion).</p>
<p>To delve a bit deeper, I recently wrote an article concerning <a href="http://www.chamberofcommerce.com/university/three-big-keyword-research-mistakes-to-avoid/">common keyword research mistakes</a> which may be of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brentwrites.com/getting-to-know-seo-keyword-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Know Your Traffic, Drive Your Content</title>
		<link>http://brentwrites.com/know-your-traffic-drive-your-content/</link>
		<comments>http://brentwrites.com/know-your-traffic-drive-your-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentwrites.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve built a site in the past few years, chances are that you&#8217;ve asked yourself “Do I really need <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/">Google Analytics</a>?” The answer, at least in my humble opinion, is always “yes.” It doesn&#8217;t matter what kind of site you&#8217;re running, either. Small business site. Blogfolio. Travel blog. Humor site. Cat blog. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve built a site in the past few years, chances are that you&#8217;ve asked yourself “Do I <em>really</em> need <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/">Google Analytics</a>?” The answer, at least in my humble opinion, is always “yes.” It doesn&#8217;t matter what kind of site you&#8217;re running, either. Small business site. Blogfolio. Travel blog. Humor site. Cat blog. It doesn&#8217;t matter, really. You want Google Analytics on your site and you want it sooner rather than later.</p>
<p><span id="more-81"></span></p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>You want to know how people are finding you.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Understand Your Audience Through Analytics</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve never used it before, Google Analytics provides you with a very, very comprehensive overview of your site and its visitors. To be honest, it&#8217;s probably more than you could ever <em>want</em> to know. The meat and potatoes of Analytics come in the form of “traffic sources” and “content.” These components are perhaps self explanatory; how your visitors are getting to your site and what they&#8217;re looking at once they get there.</p>
<p><strong>&#8230;and then Grow That Audience</strong></p>
<p>This may seem somewhat arbitrary at first, but assuming that you want to grow your site&#8217;s readership and following, traffic and content are critical. For example, you notice that your travel blog&#8217;s post about sushi restaurants in New York is driving ten times more traffic than the rest of your posts. What does this mean? People like reading about New York. People like reading about sushi. Dually noted. Revisit those topics on your site, perhaps spinning your original blog into a “top five” list. You could take things a step further and write individual posts about each restaurant you talked about in your original post.</p>
<p>Google Analytics affords a truly unique opportunity in terms of creating new content for your site. Instead of taking a shot in the dark and attempting to overcome writer&#8217;s block to come up with something to write about, you can create content based on what you already know performs well. You may also discover what sort of content <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> perform well by examining <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_rate">bounce-rate</a> and average time on-page.</p>
<p><strong>&#8230;and Know (and Grow) Your SEO</strong></p>
<p>And when we talk about content that “performs well,” we&#8217;re talking in terms of traffic and keywords. For example, if your site is ranking for a long-tail keyword (three or more words in a keyword phrase) such as “New York sushi restaurants,” you can use this information to your advantage by creating new content to help dominate that key-phrase. This doesn&#8217;t mean writing spam or keyword-stuffed drivel, but rather well-crafted blogs and articles with your keywords in place where it seems natural. Having such keywords under your belt will only do well to increase your traffic and readership, which ultimately leads to more clicks, conversions, shares, or whatever it is that you&#8217;re looking to do with your site. And really, if nothing else&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Google Analytics is Fun, Right?</strong></p>
<p>You may not care about traffic or readership, and that&#8217;s fine. If nothing else, Google Analytics serves to satisfy your curiosity. Understanding how people find your site through Analytics is a fascinating and sometimes humorous exercise in seeing how both search engines work and how people utilize them. For example, I had visitors to my former blog from keywords such as “Brent vs. Usain Bolt” and “Bret Easton Ellis.” Such tidbits of information simply make running a site that much more satisfying.</p>
<p>The takeaway from all of this is rather simple. <a href="http://brentwrites.com/why-content-is-still-king/">Google loves content</a>, and through Analytics you may better determine where your focus should (or shouldn&#8217;t be) when it comes to content creation for your site or blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brentwrites.com/know-your-traffic-drive-your-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Content is Still King</title>
		<link>http://brentwrites.com/why-content-is-still-king/</link>
		<comments>http://brentwrites.com/why-content-is-still-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentwrites.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Whether you&#8217;re a writer, marketer or simply a spectator in the SEO and Internet marketing space; you hear the phrase “content is king” constantly. Some roll their eyes at the phrase. To others, it&#8217;s their credo. Perhaps it has become a bit cliché, but I feel that it ultimately holds true in regards to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you&#8217;re a writer, marketer or simply a spectator in the SEO and Internet marketing space; you hear the phrase “content is king” constantly. Some roll their eyes at the phrase. To others, it&#8217;s their credo. <span id="more-63"></span>Perhaps it has become a bit cliché, but I feel that it ultimately holds true in regards to the success of the modern website.</p>
<p>Plenty of people are scared of SEO. They don&#8217;t understand it. But really, at the end of day, content creation is probably the component easiest to grasp, understand and ultimately execute when it comes to making your site look friendly to Google.</p>
<p>Lately I&#8217;ve read a number of “how to survive Google Panda” posts on popular marketing blogs, and they all seem to be coming in at once. I recently wrote my own piece about <a href="http://brentwrites.com/quality-content-in-a-post-panda-world/">creating quality content</a> post-Panda and how it&#8217;s become a huge talking point in the Internet marketing world.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/22195/How-to-Protect-Your-Website-Content-From-Future-Panda-Updates.aspx">This recent Hubspot article</a> details some examples of how sites can “protect” themselves for future updates rolled out by Google ala Panda.</p>
<p>But first, I couldn&#8217;t help but notice the article&#8217;s title. “How to Protect Your Website Content From Future Panda Updates.” It&#8217;s hard for me to tell by the article&#8217;s tone whether or not the title was intentionally fearful, oozing a subtext that sites need to “protect” themselves from Google (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linkbait">linkbait</a>, perhaps). While they don&#8217;t necessarily believe that Google is “out to get us,” there are many Internet marketers that remain rather critical of the search giant&#8217;s practices. I personally feel that Google is putting their best foot forward when it comes to handling web spam and the concerns of the community. Google&#8217;s ultimate aim isn&#8217;t to force webmasters to make sites that appease them, but rather to encourage the growth of sites that cater to a positive user experience.</p>
<p>How is this achieved? Content.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s talk about the article. Firstly, the author uses the “content is king” phrase right off the bat which further drives the ol&#8217; cliché home. The thesis here is that improving your site post-Panda is <em>all about content</em>. There are two points that the author makes specifically that I feel are particularly interesting:</p>
<p><strong>1. Post Content on a Regular, Frequent Basis</strong></p>
<p><strong>2. Don&#8217;t Over-optimize Your Content</strong></p>
<p>The first point has been beaten to death by the Internet marketing community and should come as no surprise. Google loves sites that update frequently and comes up with fresh content on a regular basis. “How much” and “how often” are disputable, but this basic fact should be the cornerstone of any website looking to thrive. I&#8217;m tempted to say it&#8217;s a no-brainer, but really, it just makes sense. The sites that we love and visit on a daily basis update regularly. Whenever we visit, there&#8217;s something new. That&#8217;s why such sites are popular and Google has taken notice.</p>
<p>The second point is perhaps a bit more puzzling to those trying to wrap their heads around SEO. But think about it. Stuffing keywords and having immaculate site architecture might provide you with some garbage traffic, but quality, consistent content will bring you return visitors and more conversions. I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again; “perfect SEO” means absolutely nothing if you&#8217;re providing nothing of value to your visitors. Google&#8217;s algorithm is becoming smarter and swifter, and therefore it&#8217;s time for webmasters to adapt.</p>
<p>In short, content is still king. It&#8217;s sitting on the throne and doesn&#8217;t look to step down anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brentwrites.com/why-content-is-still-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Click or Not to Click?</title>
		<link>http://brentwrites.com/to-click-or-not-to-click/</link>
		<comments>http://brentwrites.com/to-click-or-not-to-click/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentwrites.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I can honestly say that I have never clicked on an ad-banner or text-link with the intention of buying something. Very few times have I clicked an ad intentionally, and if I did it was simply out of curiosity to see what the ad was trying to sell. I&#8217;d have to imagine that such “curiosity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can honestly say that I have <em>never</em> clicked on an ad-banner or text-link with the intention of buying something. Very few times have I clicked an ad intentionally, and if I did it was simply out of curiosity to see what the ad was trying to sell. I&#8217;d have to imagine that such “curiosity traffic” is the equivalent to “garbage traffic&#8221; in the eyes of affiliate marketers, and the fact that so many sites are brimming with advertisements that either trick or literally <em>force</em> you onto a landing page raises a huge question. That is, <em>who</em> are the people that convert from affiliate ads and willingly make purchases through these marketing tactics?<span id="more-58"></span></p>
<p>This question was one of the first that came to mind when I entered the copywriting world and was introduced to Internet marketing. I became aware of the variety of sites making hundreds or thousands of dollars per day through affiliate revenue and was left puzzled. “Who actually <em>clicks</em> on these spammy-looking ads, let alone <em>buys</em> something from them?” To make a side-note here, I&#8217;m not talking so much about AdSense, as Google does a decent job of targeting their ads meanwhile also making them unobtrusive. Regardless, I didn&#8217;t understand how affiliate sites made money through flashy banners and text-links that weren&#8217;t trying to hide that they wanted you to <em>buy something</em>.</p>
<p>Conversely, I understood how content marketing worked. I understood <a href="http://brentwrites.com/quality-content-in-a-post-panda-world/">writing quality content</a> for an audience, providing that audience value, and ultimately inviting them to take part in whatever it is that you&#8217;re selling. Seth Godin refers to this as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permission_marketing">permission marketing</a>, as you invite and appeal to an audience that&#8217;s actually interested in your product or service, willing to opt-in. It&#8217;s the opposite, the sort of “interruption marketing,” where a product is pushed in your face, that I did not understand.</p>
<p>Eventually I found that a lot of affiliate success comes from the law of averages. If a site is getting huge traffic, say, tens of thousands or visitors per day, they&#8217;re going to convert <em>some</em> fraction of that into click-throughs and sales. Average click-through rates have declined to a faction of a percent these days, with that fraction seemingly getting smaller and smaller over time. Why?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but believe that it&#8217;s a combination of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_blindness">ad-blindness</a> and an increasingly tech-savvy society. When I imagine banners converting customers, I imagine the stereotypical person that&#8217;s hardly ever used the Internet or the struggling grandparent with their first computer. I feel that these stereotypes, however, are becoming less and less common. We&#8217;ve come a long way in terms of more and more users getting online, with something like 70% of adults shopping online per year. The days of fearing e-commerce are over. Likewise, I feel that the modern ad-banner as we know it will continue to decline in performance.</p>
<p>We have become conditioned, thankfully. Conditioned <em>not</em> to click. Don&#8217;t put in your credit card or SSN without some sort of security verification. The user <em>knows</em> what&#8217;s going on. It&#8217;s not 1997 anymore.</p>
<p>I feel that my generation has truly become blind to ads. We simply don&#8217;t click on them. This leads me to believe that the upcoming generations will be the same way. If so, how will interruption marketers react?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brentwrites.com/to-click-or-not-to-click/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Content to Cash: the Evolution of Blogging</title>
		<link>http://brentwrites.com/from-content-to-cash-the-evolution-of-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://brentwrites.com/from-content-to-cash-the-evolution-of-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 05:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentwrites.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Blogs. They grew up so fast.</p> <p></p> <p>Blogs began their origins in the 1980s with the dawn of the Internet as we know it, meanwhile the term “blog” was officially coined in the mid-90s. When I think about blogs personally, my mind shifts gears back when I was in middle-school and sites such as <a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs. They grew up so fast.</p>
<p><span id="more-46"></span></p>
<p>Blogs began their origins in the 1980s with the dawn of the Internet as we know it, meanwhile the term “blog” was officially coined in the mid-90s. When I think about blogs personally, my mind shifts gears back when I was in middle-school and sites such as <a href="http://www.livejournal.com">Livejournal</a> were gaining steam. Prior to this, it seemed that conversations on the web existed in solely in the realms of chat-rooms, instant messengers and message boards. The fact that platforms such as Livejournal essentially created a website (or rather, a journal) <em>for you </em>provided a sense of ownership that had previously only belonged to the “tech-savvy” that knew their way around HTML and CSS. With blogs, you didn&#8217;t need to know how to code; you only needed to know how to write.</p>
<p>And so it began.</p>
<p>Life in the post-messenger/message board world was an intriguing one. As more and more users took control of their web-based soap boxes, their voices were heard en-masse. It was easy to get drowned out in the midst of <em>so</em> many blogs and communities with so much to say. How long would the blogging community last without being touched by the wild world of advertisements and affiliates?</p>
<p>Not very, as platforms such as Google&#8217;s Blogger and WordPress (both released in 2003) changed the game completely. It wasn&#8217;t just about the soap-box anymore. “There&#8217;s gold in them there hills,” as the saying goes. Bloggers and marketers found huge success through affiliate marketing and Google AdSense. They still do. Blogs have become the bread and butter of affiliate marketers, creating search-engine friendly sites that draw huge revenues due to optimized content and targeted traffic.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s perhaps most impressive about such sites is that they essentially thrive off of the written word alone. There are no tricks, really (unless you consider Search Engine Optimization to be a form of witchcraft). When we think of making money writing, we often think of freelancing and selling articles. Microblogs and niche blog marketing combine the skills of a writer that knows what Google wants in terms of content with an SEO specialist who knows what Google wants in terms of code and site architecture. It&#8217;s a deadly combination, and everyone wants to be “that guy” who&#8217;s the hybrid of both.</p>
<p>I have mixed feelings when it comes to these heavily SEO&#8217;d blogs which have now become the lifeblood of the modern affiliate marketer. From a user perspective, it&#8217;s no fun drudging through pages and pages of trash because you&#8217;re searching a keyword that&#8217;s been beaten to death by affiliate blogs. Likewise, content writers such as myself could see a potential goldmine in such sites, but at what cost? Google&#8217;s emphasis on Social Media links and <a href="http://brentwrites.com/quality-content-in-a-post-panda-world/">post-Panda content quality</a> are hitting affiliate marketers hard, meaning these well-optimized outlets of passive income are requiring more and more active upkeep.</p>
<p>As always, it&#8217;s a game of keeping up with Google. A game that many affiliate marketers simply don&#8217;t want to play.</p>
<p>That said, I always relish in a blog that is truly free of advertisements.  It&#8217;s all very reminiscent of T<em>he Social Network </em>in which Jesse Eisenburg&#8217;s Mark Z. is incredibly reluctant to slap ads on his beloved Facebook. While Facebook is of course riddled with ads now, I think that Mr. Zuckerberg had the right idea back then. From both a usability standpoint and a simple “cool” factor harped on in David Fincher&#8217;s film, sites with too many ads simply lose appeal in the eyes of the visitor.</p>
<p>This tangent brings us to a phenomenon known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_blindness">ad-blindness</a>, but I&#8217;m afraid that&#8217;s another post entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brentwrites.com/from-content-to-cash-the-evolution-of-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality Content in a Post-Panda World</title>
		<link>http://brentwrites.com/quality-content-in-a-post-panda-world/</link>
		<comments>http://brentwrites.com/quality-content-in-a-post-panda-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentwrites.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We live in a post-Panda world when it comes to content online. Google&#8217;s Panda update (if you aren&#8217;t familiar) intended to punish sites full of what the search giant considered to be “low-quality content” in their search algorithm. Did they succeed? Depends on who you ask.</p> <p>SEOmoz did a great piece on the <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-farmer-update-analysis-of-winners-vs-losers">winners [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in a post-Panda world when it comes to content online. Google&#8217;s Panda update (if you aren&#8217;t familiar) intended to punish sites full of what the search giant considered to be “low-quality content” in their search algorithm. Did they succeed? Depends on who you ask.<span id="more-40"></span></p>
<p>SEOmoz did a great piece on the <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-farmer-update-analysis-of-winners-vs-losers">winners and losers of the Panda update</a> which details who took the biggest hits. Unsurprisingly, a good chunk of the search marketing community was absolutely outraged. There wasn&#8217;t much they could do, however, as there&#8217;s no fighting Google. Those impacted were forced to sit and stare from the sidelines as their sites saw huge drops in both traffic and revenue as a result of a significant change in Google&#8217;s algorithm. <a href="http://www.pixelrage.net/seo/my-google-panda-damage-report">This report from Pixelrage </a>details an example of such damage.</p>
<p>How do<em> I</em> feel about Panda?</p>
<p>Content mills were hit the hardest by Panda, which is clearly detailed by SEOmoz&#8217;s report. This alone sends a huge message from Google, a sentiment that says “Don&#8217;t focus on SEO; focus on producing quality content.” It&#8217;s a sentiment that I agree with wholeheartedly, both as a writer and web-user. Over-optimized sites are frustrating and often void of meaningful information. They probably should be punished and I feel that Google&#8217;s intentions were in the right place. Inevitably, some sites took hits when perhaps they shouldn&#8217;t have. Others, however, flourished.</p>
<p>A good website is worth returning to. A keyword-stuffed blog with “immaculate” site-architecture that&#8217;s filled to the brim with ads is not a good website. Google knows this, and through Panda, they let the content writers and search marketers know as well.</p>
<p>Google wants fresh, quality content and they want it on a consistent basis. At the end of the day, that&#8217;s essentially how sites thrive and grow. You visit sites like <a href="http://www.mashable.com" target="_blank">Mashable</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com" target="_blank">TechCrunch</a> because they provide interesting, unique information consistently and don&#8217;t overload you with ads. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re popular. That&#8217;s why they thrive.</p>
<p>Just some food from thought.</p>
<p><em>For a bit more on content in a post-Panda world, I wrote a piece about the importance of unique content and <a href="http://www.chamberofcommerce.com/university/business-blogging-and-building-your-audience/" target="_blank">blogging for small businesses</a> a few months ago.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brentwrites.com/quality-content-in-a-post-panda-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

